Suzuki Swift 2013 vs Honda Jazz 2011
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 1.2 - 1.6 | 1.2 - 1.3 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 94 - 136 HP | 90 - 102 HP | |
Torque: | 118 - 160 NM | 114 - 127 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.7 - 13.5 seconds | 11.4 - 12.6 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 - 6.4 | 4.5 - 5.5 | |
Suzuki Swift petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Honda Jazz. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.86 m | 3.90 m | |
Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
Height: | 1.51 m | 1.53 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Suzuki Swift is 4 cm shorter than the Honda Jazz, width is practically the same , while the height of Suzuki Swift is 2 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 211 litres | 337 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
512 litres | 883 litres | |
Honda Jazz has more luggage space. Suzuki Swift has 126 litres less trunk space than the Honda Jazz. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda Jazz (by 371 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Suzuki Swift is 0.4 metres less than that of the Honda Jazz, which means Suzuki Swift can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`480 | ~ 1`581 | |
Safety: | |||
Honda Jazz scores higher in safety tests. The Honda Jazz scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
Quality: | average | above average | |
Average price (€): | 10 800 | 5400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
|
Honda Jazz has
| |