Suzuki Swift 2004 vs Renault Clio 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Suzuki Swift is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Renault Clio can be equipped only with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.2 - 1.5 | 1.2 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 70 - 102 HP | 60 - 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 116 - 170 NM | 93 - 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 - 14.2 seconds | 8.5 - 15.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.6 - 6.5 | 4.3 - 7.9 | |
|
Suzuki Swift petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than Renault Clio. On average, Suzuki Swift equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.70 m | 3.96 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.51 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Suzuki Swift is smaller, but slightly higher. Suzuki Swift is 26 cm shorter than the Renault Clio, width is practically the same , while the height of Suzuki Swift is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 213 litres | 288 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
562 litres | 1035 litres | |
|
Renault Clio has more luggage space. Suzuki Swift has 75 litres less trunk space than the Renault Clio. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Clio (by 473 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.4 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Swift is 1.9 metres less than that of the Renault Clio, which means Suzuki Swift can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`495 | ~ 1`656 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 2800 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Swift has
|
Renault Clio has
| |