Suzuki Swift 2004 vs Mitsubishi Colt 2007
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Suzuki Swift is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Mitsubishi Colt can be equipped only with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.2 - 1.5 | 1.1 - 1.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 70 - 102 HP | 75 - 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 116 - 170 NM | 100 - 210 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 - 14.2 seconds | 8 - 12.9 seconds | |
| In general, Mitsubishi Colt are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Suzuki Swift. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.6 - 6.5 | 4.8 - 6.8 | |
|
Suzuki Swift petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi Colt. On average, Suzuki Swift equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Colt. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.70 m | 3.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.51 m | 1.52 m | |
|
Suzuki Swift is smaller. Suzuki Swift is 12 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Colt, width is practically the same , while the height of Suzuki Swift is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 213 litres | 220 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
562 litres | 400 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.4 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Swift is 1.4 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Colt, which means Suzuki Swift can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 1`495 kg | ~ 1`463 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`019 kg | ~ 1`155 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 476 kg | ~ 308 kg | |
| Suzuki Swift load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 35 procentiem more than Mitsubishi Colt. Therefore, Suzuki Swift is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 2800 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Swift has
|
Mitsubishi Colt has
| |