Suzuki Swift 2004 vs Mitsubishi Colt 2007

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Suzuki Swift
2004 - 2010
Mitsubishi Colt
2007 - 2008
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Front wheel drive (FWD)
Suzuki Swift is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Mitsubishi Colt can be equipped only with front wheel drive.
Engines: 1.2 - 1.51.1 - 1.5

Performance

Power: 70 - 102 HP75 - 150 HP
Torque: 116 - 170 NM100 - 210 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10 - 14.2 seconds8 - 12.9 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.6 - 6.54.8 - 6.8
Suzuki Swift petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi Colt. On average, Suzuki Swift equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Colt.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 3.70 m3.81 m
Width: 1.69 m1.70 m
Height: 1.51 m1.52 m
Suzuki Swift is smaller.
Suzuki Swift is 12 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Colt, width is practically the same , while the height of Suzuki Swift is 2 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 213 litres220 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
562 litres400 litres
Suzuki Swift has 7 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi Colt. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Suzuki Swift (by 162 litres).
Turning diameter: 9.4 meters10.8 meters
The turning circle of the Suzuki Swift is 1.4 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Colt, which means Suzuki Swift can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`495~ 1`463
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

above average
Average price (€): 2400no data
Pros and Cons: Suzuki Swift has
  • available with 4x4 drive
  • better manoeuvrability
Mitsubishi Colt has
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv