Suzuki Swift 2004 vs Mitsubishi Colt 2008
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Suzuki Swift is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Mitsubishi Colt can be equipped only with front wheel drive. | |||
Engines: | 1.2 - 1.5 (petrol, diesel) | 1.1 - 1.5 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 70 - 102 HP | 75 - 109 HP | |
Torque: | 116 - 170 NM | 100 - 145 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 - 14.2 seconds | 9.8 - 12.8 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.6 - 6.5 | 5.5 - 6.1 | |
Suzuki Swift petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi Colt. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.70 m | 3.88 m | |
Width: | 1.69 m | 1.70 m | |
Height: | 1.51 m | 1.52 m | |
Suzuki Swift is smaller. Suzuki Swift is 18 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Colt, width is practically the same , while the height of Suzuki Swift is 2 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 213 litres | 220 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
562 litres | no data | |
Suzuki Swift has 7 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi Colt. | |||
Turning diameter: | 9.4 meters | 10.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Suzuki Swift is 1.4 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Colt, which means Suzuki Swift can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`495 | ~ 1`439 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | average | above average | |
Average price (€): | 2800 | 2800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Swift has
|
Mitsubishi Colt has
| |