Suzuki Swift 2010 vs Nissan Micra 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.2 (petrol, diesel) | 1.2 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 - 94 HP | 80 - 98 HP | |
| Torque: | 118 - 190 NM | 110 - 142 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.3 - 13.5 seconds | 11.3 - 14.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 - 5.6 | 4.1 - 5.4 | |
|
Suzuki Swift petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Nissan Micra. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.85 m | 3.78 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.67 m | |
| Height: | 1.51 m | 1.52 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Suzuki Swift is 7 cm longer than the Nissan Micra, 3 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 204 litres | 265 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1132 litres | |
|
Nissan Micra has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Suzuki Swift has 61 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Micra. This could mean that the Suzuki Swift uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.6 meters | 9.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Swift is 0.3 metres more than that of the Nissan Micra. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`507 | ~ 1`454 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Suzuki Swift scores higher in safety tests. The Suzuki Swift scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 4000 | 4400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Swift has
|
Nissan Micra has
| |