Subaru Outback 1998 vs Subaru Outback 2004
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 3.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 209 HP | 245 HP | |
| Torque: | 282 NM | 297 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.9 seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
|
Subaru Outback 2004 is a more dynamic driving. Subaru Outback 1998 engine produces 36 HP less power than Subaru Outback 2004, whereas torque is 15 NM less than Subaru Outback 2004. Due to the lower power, Subaru Outback 1998 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.5 | 9.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.5 l/100km | 11.1 l/100km | |
|
By specification Subaru Outback 1998 consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Outback 2004, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Subaru Outback 1998 could require 105 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Subaru Outback 1998 consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Outback 2004. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 600 km in combined cycle | 610 km in combined cycle | |
| 820 km on highway | 780 km on highway | ||
| 600 km with real consumption | 540 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.72 m | 4.73 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.58 m | 1.54 m | |
|
Subaru Outback 1998 is smaller, but slightly higher. Subaru Outback 1998 is 1 cm shorter than the Subaru Outback 2004, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Subaru Outback 1998 is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 527 litres | 429 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1649 litres | 1628 litres | |
|
Subaru Outback 1998 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Subaru Outback 2004 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Subaru Outback 1998 (by 21 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.8 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 2`085 kg | 2`000 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`610 kg | 1`545 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 475 kg | 455 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Subaru Outback has
|
Subaru Outback has
| |