Subaru Outback 1998 vs Rover 75 2001
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Subaru Outback) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Rover 75) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 209 HP | 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 282 NM | 260 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.9 seconds | 12.3 seconds | |
|
Subaru Outback is more dynamic to drive. Subaru Outback engine produces 93 HP more power than Rover 75, whereas torque is 22 NM more than Rover 75. Thanks to more power Subaru Outback reaches 100 km/h speed 3.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.5 | 5.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.5 l/100km | 6.3 l/100km | |
|
The Rover 75 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Subaru Outback consumes 4.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Rover 75, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Subaru Outback could require 705 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Subaru Outback consumes 4.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Rover 75. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 600 km in combined cycle | 1120 km in combined cycle | |
| 820 km on highway | 1380 km on highway | ||
| 600 km with real consumption | 1030 km with real consumption | ||
| Rover 75 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.72 m | 4.79 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.58 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Subaru Outback is smaller, but higher. Subaru Outback is 7 cm shorter than the Rover 75, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Subaru Outback is 16 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 527 litres | 400 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1649 litres | 1222 litres | |
|
Subaru Outback has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Subaru Outback has 127 litres more trunk space than the Rover 75. The Rover 75 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Subaru Outback (by 427 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`085 | 2`090 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Subaru Outback has
|
Rover 75 has
| |