Subaru Outback 1998 vs Citroen C5 2001
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 209 HP | 110 HP | |
Torque: | 282 NM | 250 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.9 seconds | 11.6 seconds | |
Subaru Outback is more dynamic to drive. Subaru Outback engine produces 99 HP more power than Citroen C5, whereas torque is 32 NM more than Citroen C5. Thanks to more power Subaru Outback reaches 100 km/h speed 2.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.5 | 5.7 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 10.5 l/100km | 6.3 l/100km | |
The Citroen C5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Subaru Outback consumes 4.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C5, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Subaru Outback could require 720 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Subaru Outback consumes 4.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C5. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 66 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 600 km in combined cycle | 1150 km in combined cycle | |
820 km on highway | 1430 km on highway | ||
600 km with real consumption | 1040 km with real consumption | ||
Citroen C5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.72 m | 4.76 m | |
Width: | 1.74 m | 1.77 m | |
Height: | 1.58 m | 1.52 m | |
Subaru Outback is smaller, but higher. Subaru Outback is 4 cm shorter than the Citroen C5, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Subaru Outback is 6 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 527 litres | no data | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1649 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | no data | 11.4 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 2`085 | 1`500 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | average | |
Average price (€): | 1200 | 1000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Subaru Outback has
|
Citroen C5 has
| |