Subaru Outback 1998 vs Honda CR-V 1997
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 156 HP | 128 HP | |
| Torque: | 223 NM | 182 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
|
Subaru Outback is more dynamic to drive. Subaru Outback engine produces 28 HP more power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 41 NM more than Honda CR-V. Thanks to more power Subaru Outback reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.0 | 10.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.5 l/100km | 9.6 l/100km | |
|
The Subaru Outback is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Subaru Outback consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that by driving the Subaru Outback over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Subaru Outback consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 710 km in combined cycle | 570 km in combined cycle | |
| 880 km on highway | 670 km on highway | ||
| 670 km with real consumption | 600 km with real consumption | ||
| Subaru Outback gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.72 m | 4.53 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.58 m | 1.68 m | |
| Subaru Outback is 19 cm longer than the Honda CR-V, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Subaru Outback is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 527 litres | 375 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1649 litres | 670 litres | |
|
Subaru Outback has more luggage capacity. Subaru Outback has 152 litres more trunk space than the Honda CR-V. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Subaru Outback (by 979 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`015 | 1`900 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Subaru Outback has
|
| |