Subaru Outback 2002 vs Volvo V70 2002
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 209 HP | 210 HP | |
| Torque: | 282 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.9 seconds | 8 seconds | |
|
Volvo V70 is a more dynamic driving. Subaru Outback engine produces 1 HP less power than Volvo V70, whereas torque is 38 NM less than Volvo V70. Due to the lower power, Subaru Outback reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.5 | 10.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.2 l/100km | 10.4 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo V70 is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Subaru Outback consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V70, which means that by driving the Subaru Outback over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Subaru Outback consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V70. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.72 m | 4.71 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.58 m | 1.51 m | |
| Subaru Outback and Volvo V70 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 464 litres | 485 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1641 litres | |
|
Volvo V70 has more luggage space. Subaru Outback has 21 litres less trunk space than the Volvo V70. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`010 | 2`100 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Volvo V70 has
| |