Subaru Outback 2002 vs Subaru Legacy 2003
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 209 HP | 165 HP | |
Torque: | 282 NM | 226 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.9 seconds | 11 seconds | |
Subaru Outback is more dynamic to drive. Subaru Outback engine produces 44 HP more power than Subaru Legacy, whereas torque is 56 NM more than Subaru Legacy. Thanks to more power Subaru Outback reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.5 | 8.3 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 11.2 l/100km | 9.3 l/100km | |
The Subaru Legacy is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Subaru Outback consumes 2.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Legacy, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Subaru Outback could require 330 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Subaru Outback consumes 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Legacy. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.72 m | 4.72 m | |
Width: | 1.74 m | 1.73 m | |
Height: | 1.58 m | 1.47 m | |
Subaru Outback and Subaru Legacy are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 464 litres | 429 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1649 litres | |
Subaru Outback has more luggage capacity. Subaru Outback has 35 litres more trunk space than the Subaru Legacy. | |||
Turning diameter: | no data | 10.8 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 2`010 | 1`945 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | high | |
Average price (€): | 1800 | 1800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Subaru Outback has
|
Subaru Legacy has
| |