Subaru Outback 2002 vs Renault Laguna 2001
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 209 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 282 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.9 seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
|
Subaru Outback is more dynamic to drive. Subaru Outback engine produces 89 HP more power than Renault Laguna, whereas torque is 12 NM more than Renault Laguna. Thanks to more power Subaru Outback reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.5 | 5.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.2 l/100km | 6.2 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Laguna is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Subaru Outback consumes 4.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Laguna, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Subaru Outback could require 735 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Subaru Outback consumes 5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Laguna. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.72 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.58 m | 1.44 m | |
| Subaru Outback is 2 cm longer than the Renault Laguna, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Subaru Outback is 14 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 464 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`010 | 1`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Subaru Outback has
|
Renault Laguna has
| |