Subaru Outback 2002 vs Mazda 6 2002
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 209 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 282 NM | 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.9 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
|
Subaru Outback is more dynamic to drive. Subaru Outback engine produces 73 HP more power than Mazda 6, but torque is 28 NM less than Mazda 6. Thanks to more power Subaru Outback reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.5 | 6.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.2 l/100km | 6.9 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda 6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Subaru Outback consumes 4.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Subaru Outback could require 615 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Subaru Outback consumes 4.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.72 m | 4.69 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.58 m | 1.45 m | |
| Subaru Outback is 3 cm longer than the Mazda 6, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Subaru Outback is 13 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 464 litres | 505 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1712 litres | |
|
Mazda 6 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Subaru Outback has 41 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 6. This could mean that the Subaru Outback uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`010 | 2`010 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Subaru Outback has
|
Mazda 6 has
| |