Subaru Outback 2002 vs Volkswagen Passat 2000
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 209 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 282 NM | 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.9 seconds | 11 seconds | |
|
Subaru Outback is more dynamic to drive. Subaru Outback engine produces 79 HP more power than Volkswagen Passat, but torque is 28 NM less than Volkswagen Passat. Thanks to more power Subaru Outback reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.5 | 6.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.2 l/100km | 6.5 l/100km | |
|
The Volkswagen Passat is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Subaru Outback consumes 4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Passat, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Subaru Outback could require 600 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Subaru Outback consumes 4.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Passat. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.72 m | 4.68 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.58 m | 1.50 m | |
| Subaru Outback is 4 cm longer than the Volkswagen Passat, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Subaru Outback is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 464 litres | 450 litres | |
| Subaru Outback has 14 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Passat. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`010 | 2`130 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Subaru Outback has
|
Volkswagen Passat has
| |