Subaru Outback 2002 vs Volvo V70 2002
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 156 HP | 210 HP | |
Torque: | 223 NM | 320 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 seconds | 7.6 seconds | |
Volvo V70 is a more dynamic driving. Subaru Outback engine produces 54 HP less power than Volvo V70, whereas torque is 97 NM less than Volvo V70. Due to the lower power, Subaru Outback reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.5 | 10.2 | |
The Subaru Outback is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Subaru Outback consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V70, which means that by driving the Subaru Outback over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.72 m | 4.71 m | |
Width: | 1.74 m | 1.80 m | |
Height: | 1.58 m | 1.51 m | |
Subaru Outback and Volvo V70 are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 464 litres | 485 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1641 litres | |
Volvo V70 has more luggage space. Subaru Outback has 21 litres less trunk space than the Volvo V70. | |||
Turning diameter: | no data | 11.6 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`980 | 2`200 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | below average | |
Average price (€): | 1800 | 1600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Subaru Outback has
|
Volvo V70 has
| |