Subaru Outback 2004 vs Subaru Outback 2009
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 245 HP | 167 HP | |
Torque: | 297 NM | 229 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 seconds | 10.4 seconds | |
Subaru Outback 2004 is more dynamic to drive. Subaru Outback 2004 engine produces 78 HP more power than Subaru Outback 2009, whereas torque is 68 NM more than Subaru Outback 2009. Thanks to more power Subaru Outback 2004 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.8 | 8.4 | |
The Subaru Outback 2009 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Subaru Outback 2004 consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Outback 2009, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Subaru Outback 2004 could require 210 litres more fuel. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.73 m | 4.78 m | |
Width: | 1.77 m | 1.82 m | |
Height: | 1.54 m | 1.61 m | |
Subaru Outback 2004 is smaller. Subaru Outback 2004 is 5 cm shorter than the Subaru Outback 2009, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Subaru Outback 2004 is 7 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 526 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.2 meters | |
The turning circle of the Subaru Outback 2004 is 0.4 metres less than that of the Subaru Outback 2009. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | no data | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 2400 | 4800 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 9.0/10 | 7.6/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Subaru Outback has
|
Subaru Outback has
| |