Subaru Outback 2003 vs Volvo XC70 2000
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 173 HP | 200 HP | |
| Torque: | 227 NM | 285 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 seconds | 8 seconds | |
|
Volvo XC70 is a more dynamic driving. Subaru Outback engine produces 27 HP less power than Volvo XC70, whereas torque is 58 NM less than Volvo XC70. Due to the lower power, Subaru Outback reaches 100 km/h speed 2.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.7 | 10.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.7 l/100km | 11.7 l/100km | |
|
The Subaru Outback is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Subaru Outback consumes 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC70, which means that by driving the Subaru Outback over 15,000 km in a year you can save 270 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Subaru Outback consumes 2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC70. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 68 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 640 km in combined cycle | |
| 920 km on highway | 790 km on highway | ||
| 650 km with real consumption | 580 km with real consumption | ||
| Subaru Outback gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.73 m | 4.73 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.55 m | 1.56 m | |
| Subaru Outback and Volvo XC70 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 485 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1641 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Subaru Outback is 0.8 metres less than that of the Volvo XC70, which means Subaru Outback can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`220 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 2400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 9.0/10 | 7.9/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Subaru Outback has
|
Volvo XC70 has
| |