Subaru Outback 2003 vs Subaru Outback 2009
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 173 HP | 167 HP | |
| Torque: | 227 NM | 229 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 seconds | 10.4 seconds | |
|
Subaru Outback 2009 is a more dynamic driving. Subaru Outback 2003 engine produces 6 HP more power than Subaru Outback 2009, but torque is 2 NM less than Subaru Outback 2009. Despite the higher power, Subaru Outback 2003 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.7 | 8.4 | |
| Subaru Outback 2003 consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Outback 2009, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Subaru Outback 2003 could require 45 litres more fuel. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.73 m | 4.78 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.55 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Subaru Outback 2003 is smaller. Subaru Outback 2003 is 5 cm shorter than the Subaru Outback 2009, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Subaru Outback 2003 is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 459 litres | 526 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1649 litres | no data | |
|
Subaru Outback 2009 has more luggage space. Subaru Outback 2003 has 67 litres less trunk space than the Subaru Outback 2009. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Subaru Outback 2003 is 0.4 metres less than that of the Subaru Outback 2009. | |||
| Gross weight: | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 3800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 9.0/10 | 7.6/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Subaru Outback has
|
Subaru Outback has
| |