Subaru Outback 2003 vs Renault Laguna 2001
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 1.9 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Subaru Outback) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Renault Laguna) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 173 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 227 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
| Subaru Outback engine produces 53 HP more power than Renault Laguna, but torque is 43 NM less than Renault Laguna. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.7 | 5.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.7 l/100km | 6.2 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Laguna is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Subaru Outback consumes 3.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Laguna, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Subaru Outback could require 465 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Subaru Outback consumes 3.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Laguna. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 1250 km in combined cycle | |
| 920 km on highway | 1450 km on highway | ||
| 650 km with real consumption | 1120 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Laguna gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 370'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Renault Laguna engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 11 other car models, including Volvo V40, Renault Scenic, Volvo S40, Mitsubishi Carisma | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Renault Laguna 2001 1.9 engine: Long-lasting and fuel-efficient engine. Maintaining oil change and maintenance intervals is essential for a long engine life, as poor or untimely oil changes can result in turbine and oil pump damage, followed ... More about Renault Laguna 2001 1.9 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.73 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.55 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Subaru Outback is larger. Subaru Outback is 3 cm longer than the Renault Laguna, 2 cm wider, while the height of Subaru Outback is 11 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Subaru Outback is 0.1 metres less than that of the Renault Laguna. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 1000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 9.0/10 | 6.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Subaru Outback has
|
Renault Laguna has
| |