Subaru Outback 2003 vs Jaguar X-Type 2004
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 173 HP | 130 HP | |
Torque: | 227 NM | 330 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 seconds | 10.2 seconds | |
Jaguar X-Type is a more dynamic driving. Subaru Outback engine produces 43 HP more power than Jaguar X-Type, but torque is 103 NM less than Jaguar X-Type. Despite the higher power, Subaru Outback reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.7 | 5.8 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 9.7 l/100km | 6.4 l/100km | |
The Jaguar X-Type is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Subaru Outback consumes 2.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar X-Type, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Subaru Outback could require 435 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Subaru Outback consumes 3.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar X-Type. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 61 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 1050 km in combined cycle | |
920 km on highway | 1290 km on highway | ||
650 km with real consumption | 950 km with real consumption | ||
Jaguar X-Type gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.73 m | 4.72 m | |
Width: | 1.77 m | 1.79 m | |
Height: | 1.55 m | 1.48 m | |
Subaru Outback is 1 cm longer than the Jaguar X-Type, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Subaru Outback is 7 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 445 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1415 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.8 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`050 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 2400 | 2600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Subaru Outback has
|
Jaguar X-Type has
| |