Subaru Outback 2009 vs Subaru Forester 2011

 
Subaru Outback
2009 - 2013
Subaru Forester
2011 - 2013
Body: Estate car / wagonCrossover / SUV
Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs.
Gearbox: ManualAutomatic
Engine: 2.5 Petrol2.5 Petrol

Performance

Power: 167 HP263 HP
Torque: 229 NM347 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.6 seconds6.5 seconds
Subaru Forester is a more dynamic driving.
Subaru Outback engine produces 96 HP less power than Subaru Forester, whereas torque is 118 NM less than Subaru Forester. Due to the lower power, Subaru Outback reaches 100 km/h speed 3.1 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.610.5
The Subaru Outback is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Subaru Outback consumes 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Forester, which means that by driving the Subaru Outback over 15,000 km in a year you can save 285 litres of fuel.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Dimensions

Length: 4.78 m4.56 m
Width: 1.82 m1.78 m
Height: 1.61 m1.68 m
Subaru Outback is larger, but lower.
Subaru Outback is 22 cm longer than the Subaru Forester, 4 cm wider, while the height of Subaru Outback is 7 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 526 litresno data
Turning diameter: 11.2 metersno data
Gross weight (kg): no datano data
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
average
Average price (€): 46005400
Pros and Cons: Subaru Outback has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • lower price
Subaru Forester has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv