Subaru Outback 2009 vs Honda CR-V 2007
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 167 HP | 166 HP | |
| Torque: | 229 NM | 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 seconds | 11 seconds | |
|
Subaru Outback is more dynamic to drive. Subaru Outback engine produces 1 HP more power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 9 NM more than Honda CR-V. Thanks to more power Subaru Outback reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.6 | 9.5 | |
|
The Subaru Outback is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Subaru Outback consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that by driving the Subaru Outback over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 610 km in combined cycle | |
| 1020 km on highway | 780 km on highway | ||
| Subaru Outback gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.78 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.68 m | |
| Subaru Outback is 26 cm longer than the Honda CR-V, width is practically the same , while the height of Subaru Outback is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 526 litres | 556 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2019 litres | 955 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Subaru Outback uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Subaru Outback (by 1064 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Subaru Outback is 0.6 metres less than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Subaru Outback can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`034 kg | 2`160 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`608 kg | 1`631 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 426 kg | 529 kg | |
| Subaru Outback load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 24 procentiem less than Honda CR-V. Therefore, Honda CR-V is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 3800 | 4800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.6/10 | 8.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Subaru Outback has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |