Subaru Outback 2009 vs Volvo XC70 2008
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 3.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 167 HP | 285 HP | |
| Torque: | 229 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.4 seconds | 7 seconds | |
|
Volvo XC70 is a more dynamic driving. Subaru Outback engine produces 118 HP less power than Volvo XC70, whereas torque is 171 NM less than Volvo XC70. Due to the lower power, Subaru Outback reaches 100 km/h speed 3.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.4 | 11.5 | |
|
The Subaru Outback is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Subaru Outback consumes 3.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC70, which means that by driving the Subaru Outback over 15,000 km in a year you can save 465 litres of fuel. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.78 m | 4.84 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.60 m | |
|
Subaru Outback is smaller, but slightly higher. Subaru Outback is 7 cm shorter than the Volvo XC70, 4 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 526 litres | 575 litres | |
|
Volvo XC70 has more luggage space. Subaru Outback has 49 litres less trunk space than the Volvo XC70. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Subaru Outback is 0.8 metres less than that of the Volvo XC70, which means Subaru Outback can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`220 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 4800 | 7000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.6/10 | 8.3/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Subaru Outback has
|
Volvo XC70 has
| |