Subaru Outback 2009 vs Mazda 6 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 167 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 229 NM | 226 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.4 seconds | 8.4 seconds | |
|
Mazda 6 is a more dynamic driving. Subaru Outback engine produces 3 HP less power than Mazda 6, but torque is 3 NM more than Mazda 6. Due to the lower power, Subaru Outback reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.4 | 8.1 | |
| Subaru Outback consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Subaru Outback could require 45 litres more fuel. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.78 m | 4.79 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.49 m | |
| Subaru Outback is 1 cm shorter than the Mazda 6, 3 cm wider, while the height of Subaru Outback is 12 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 526 litres | 519 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1751 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Subaru Outback has 7 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 6. The Mazda 6 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Subaru Outback is 0.4 metres more than that of the Mazda 6. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`010 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 5600 | 4200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Subaru Outback has
|
Mazda 6 has
| |