Subaru Outback 2013 vs Peugeot 508 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 173 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 235 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
|
Peugeot 508 is a more dynamic driving. Subaru Outback engine produces 10 HP more power than Peugeot 508, but torque is 105 NM less than Peugeot 508. Despite the higher power, Subaru Outback reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.6 | 5.7 | |
|
The Peugeot 508 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Subaru Outback consumes 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 508, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Subaru Outback could require 285 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 72 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 1260 km in combined cycle | |
| 1040 km on highway | 1600 km on highway | ||
| Peugeot 508 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Peugeot 508 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Subaru Forester, Subaru Legacy | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Citroen C5, Peugeot 3008, Citroen DS4 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Peugeot 508 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 4.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Subaru Outback is smaller, but higher. Subaru Outback is 2 cm shorter than the Peugeot 508, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Subaru Outback is 13 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 526 litres | 560 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 560 litres | |
|
Peugeot 508 has more luggage space. Subaru Outback has 34 litres less trunk space than the Peugeot 508. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Subaru Outback is 0.9 metres less than that of the Peugeot 508, which means Subaru Outback can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`040 | 2`180 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 17 400 | 5200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Subaru Outback has
|
Peugeot 508 has
| |