Subaru Outback 2013 vs Subaru Outback 2009

 
Subaru Outback
2013 - 2018
Subaru Outback
2009 - 2013
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Diesel2.5 Petrol
Diesel (Subaru Outback 2013) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Subaru Outback 2009) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences."

Performance

Power: 150 HP167 HP
Torque: 350 NM229 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.7 seconds10.4 seconds
Subaru Outback 2013 is more dynamic to drive.
Subaru Outback 2013 engine produces 17 HP less power than Subaru Outback 2009, but torque is 121 NM more than Subaru Outback 2009. Despite less power, Subaru Outback 2013 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.38.4
The Subaru Outback 2013 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Subaru Outback 2013 consumes 2.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Outback 2009, which means that by driving the Subaru Outback 2013 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 315 litres of fuel.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Dimensions

Length: 4.79 m4.78 m
Width: 1.82 m1.82 m
Height: 1.61 m1.61 m
Both cars are similar in size. Subaru Outback 2013 is 2 cm longer than the Subaru Outback 2009, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 526 litres526 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
1848 litresno data
Turning diameter: 11 meters11.2 meters
The turning circle of the Subaru Outback 2013 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Subaru Outback 2009.
Power steering: Electric power steeringHydraulic power steering
Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering.
Gross weight: 2`100 kgno data
Safety: no data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 11 2003800
Pros and Cons: Subaru Outback has
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • electric power steering
Subaru Outback has
  • more power
  • hydraulic power steering
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv