Subaru Outback 2013 vs Renault Laguna 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.7 seconds | 12.1 seconds | |
|
Subaru Outback is more dynamic to drive. Subaru Outback engine produces 40 HP more power than Renault Laguna, whereas torque is 110 NM more than Renault Laguna. Thanks to more power Subaru Outback reaches 100 km/h speed 2.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 4.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.9 l/100km | 5.6 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Laguna is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Subaru Outback consumes 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Laguna, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Subaru Outback could require 300 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Subaru Outback consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Laguna. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 68 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1010 km in combined cycle | 1580 km in combined cycle | |
| 1140 km on highway | 1740 km on highway | ||
| 920 km with real consumption | 1210 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Laguna gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 17 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Subaru Forester, Subaru Legacy | Installed on at least 22 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Scenic, Dacia Duster, Nissan Juke | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Renault Laguna 2013 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Renault Laguna 2013 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.45 m | |
| Subaru Outback is 1 cm shorter than the Renault Laguna, width is practically the same , while the height of Subaru Outback is 16 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 526 litres | 508 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Subaru Outback has 18 litres more trunk space than the Renault Laguna. The Renault Laguna may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Subaru Outback is 0.1 metres less than that of the Renault Laguna. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`100 | 1`957 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 17 200 | 4800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Subaru Outback has
|
Renault Laguna has
| |