Subaru Outback 2013 vs Hyundai i40 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.7 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 330 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.7 seconds | 12 seconds | |
|
Subaru Outback is more dynamic to drive. Subaru Outback engine produces 14 HP more power than Hyundai i40, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Hyundai i40. Thanks to more power Subaru Outback reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 5.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.9 l/100km | 6.9 l/100km | |
|
The Hyundai i40 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Subaru Outback consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai i40, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Subaru Outback could require 105 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1010 km in combined cycle | 1250 km in combined cycle | |
| 1140 km on highway | 1450 km on highway | ||
| 920 km with real consumption | 1010 km with real consumption | ||
| Hyundai i40 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 17 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Subaru Forester, Subaru Legacy | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Kia Sportage, Hyundai Tucson, Hyundai ix35, Kia Optima | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Hyundai i40 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 4.77 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Subaru Outback is larger. Subaru Outback is 2 cm longer than the Hyundai i40, width is practically the same , while the height of Subaru Outback is 14 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 526 litres | 553 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1719 litres | |
|
Hyundai i40 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Subaru Outback has 27 litres less trunk space than the Hyundai i40. This could mean that the Subaru Outback uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Subaru Outback is 0.1 metres more than that of the Hyundai i40. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`100 | 2`150 | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Hyundai i40 scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 17 200 | 5800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Subaru Outback has
|
Hyundai i40 has
| |