Subaru Outback 2019 vs Volvo V90 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Subaru Outback) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Volvo V90) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 260 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 375 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 8.7 seconds | |
| Subaru Outback engine produces 70 HP more power than Volvo V90, but torque is 25 NM less than Volvo V90. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.0 | 4.9 | |
|
The Volvo V90 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Subaru Outback consumes 4.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V90, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Subaru Outback could require 615 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 1220 km in combined cycle | |
| 890 km on highway | 1360 km on highway | ||
| Volvo V90 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 220 mm (8.7 inches) | 153 mm (6 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Subaru Outback can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
| Volvo V90 2016 2.0 engine: The Volvo D4204T14 is a 2.0-liter four-cylinder diesel from the VEA engine family, equipped with a twin-turbo setup and producing around 190 hp. It is a modern and efficient engine designed for good fuel economy and strong performance. When properly maintained, it can reach roughly ... More about Volvo V90 2016 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.86 m | 4.94 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Subaru Outback is smaller, but higher. Subaru Outback is 8 cm shorter than the Volvo V90, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Subaru Outback is 20 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 920 litres | 560 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2143 litres | 1526 litres | |
|
Subaru Outback has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Volvo V90 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Subaru Outback (by 617 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.4 meters | |
| Gross weight: | no data | 2`380 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 22 000 | 18 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Subaru Outback has
|
Volvo V90 has
| |