Subaru Outback 2019 vs Kia Optima 2016

 
Subaru Outback
2019 - 2022
Kia Optima
2016 - 2018
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.4 Petrol1.7 Diesel
Petrol engines (Subaru Outback) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Kia Optima) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences.

Performance

Power: 260 HP141 HP
Torque: 375 NM340 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: n/a seconds11.1 seconds
Subaru Outback engine produces 119 HP more power than Kia Optima, whereas torque is 35 NM more than Kia Optima.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.04.6
The Kia Optima is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Subaru Outback consumes 4.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia Optima, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Subaru Outback could require 660 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 70 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 770 km in combined cycle1520 km in combined cycle
890 km on highway1660 km on highway
Kia Optima gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Front wheel drive (FWD)
Ground clearance: 220 mm (8.7 inches)135 mm (5.3 inches)
Because of the higher ground clearance, Subaru Outback can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds.

Dimensions

Length: 4.86 m4.86 m
Width: 1.85 m1.86 m
Height: 1.68 m1.47 m
Subaru Outback and Kia Optima are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 920 litres553 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
2143 litres1686 litres
Subaru Outback has more luggage capacity.
Subaru Outback has 367 litres more trunk space than the Kia Optima. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Subaru Outback (by 457 litres).
Turning diameter: no data10.9 meters
Gross weight: no data2`150 kg
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 22 00012 400
Pros and Cons: Subaru Outback has
  • more power
  • has 4x4 drive
  • higher ground clearance
  • roomier boot
Kia Optima has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv