Subaru Outback 2003 vs Honda CR-V 2007
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 250 HP | 166 HP | |
| Torque: | 339 NM | 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 11 seconds | |
| Subaru Outback engine produces 84 HP more power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 119 NM more than Honda CR-V. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.5 | 9.5 | |
|
The Honda CR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Subaru Outback consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Subaru Outback could require 150 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 600 km in combined cycle | 610 km in combined cycle | |
| 680 km on highway | 780 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.68 m | |
| Subaru Outback is 28 cm longer than the Honda CR-V, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Subaru Outback is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 459 litres | 556 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1649 litres | 955 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Subaru Outback uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Subaru Outback (by 694 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Subaru Outback is 1 metres less than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Subaru Outback can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`060 kg | 2`160 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`550 kg | 1`631 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 510 kg | 529 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 4800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 9.0/10 | 8.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Subaru Outback has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |