Subaru Outback 1999 vs Subaru Outback 2003

 
Subaru Outback
1999 - 2003
Subaru Outback
2003 - 2006
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.5 Petrol2.5 Petrol

Performance

Power: 156 HP165 HP
Torque: 223 NM226 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.5 seconds10.9 seconds
Subaru Outback 1999 engine produces 9 HP less power than Subaru Outback 2003, whereas torque is 3 NM less than Subaru Outback 2003. Despite less power, Subaru Outback 1999 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.08.5
Real fuel consumption: 10.7 l/100km9.8 l/100km
The Subaru Outback 2003 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Subaru Outback 1999 consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Outback 2003, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Subaru Outback 1999 could require 75 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Subaru Outback 1999 consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Outback 2003.
Fuel tank capacity: 64 litres60 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 710 km in combined cycle700 km in combined cycle
880 km on highway890 km on highway
590 km with real consumption610 km with real consumption
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Dimensions

Length: 4.72 m4.73 m
Width: 1.74 m1.77 m
Height: 1.58 m1.54 m
Subaru Outback 1999 is smaller, but slightly higher.
Subaru Outback 1999 is 1 cm shorter than the Subaru Outback 2003, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Subaru Outback 1999 is 4 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 459 litres459 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
1649 litres1649 litres
Turning diameter: no data10.8 meters
Gross weight: 2`015 kg1`800 kg
Net weight:1`480 kg1`430 kg
Load capacity:535 kg370 kg
Subaru Outback 1999 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 31 procentiem more than Subaru Outback 2003. Therefore, Subaru Outback 1999 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads.
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 16002200
Pros and Cons: Subaru Outback has
  • more dynamic
  • higher carrying (cargo) capacity
  • lower price
Subaru Outback has
  • more power
  • lower fuel consumption
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv