Subaru Outback 1999 vs Subaru Forester 1997
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 156 HP | 125 HP | |
| Torque: | 223 NM | 184 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 seconds | 12.4 seconds | |
|
Subaru Outback is more dynamic to drive. Subaru Outback engine produces 31 HP more power than Subaru Forester, whereas torque is 39 NM more than Subaru Forester. Thanks to more power Subaru Outback reaches 100 km/h speed 2.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.0 | 9.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.7 l/100km | 10.4 l/100km | |
|
By specification Subaru Outback consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Forester, which means that by driving the Subaru Outback over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Subaru Outback consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Forester. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 710 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
| 880 km on highway | 800 km on highway | ||
| 590 km with real consumption | 570 km with real consumption | ||
| Subaru Outback gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.72 m | 4.45 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.58 m | 1.60 m | |
| Subaru Outback is 27 cm longer than the Subaru Forester, width is practically the same , while the height of Subaru Outback is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 459 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1649 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`015 | 1`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Subaru Outback has
|
| |