Subaru Outback 2017 vs Volvo V70 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Subaru Outback) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Volvo V70) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 175 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 235 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Volvo V70 is a more dynamic driving. Subaru Outback engine produces 12 HP more power than Volvo V70, but torque is 165 NM less than Volvo V70. Despite the higher power, Subaru Outback reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 4.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.6 l/100km | 7.0 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo V70 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Subaru Outback consumes 2.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V70, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Subaru Outback could require 420 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Subaru Outback consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V70. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 1420 km in combined cycle | |
| 950 km on highway | 1620 km on highway | ||
| 690 km with real consumption | 1000 km with real consumption | ||
| Volvo V70 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.82 m | 4.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.55 m | |
| Subaru Outback and Volvo V70 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 512 litres | 575 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1580 litres | |
|
Volvo V70 has more luggage space. Subaru Outback has 63 litres less trunk space than the Volvo V70. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Subaru Outback is 0.2 metres less than that of the Volvo V70. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`100 | 2`310 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 25 400 | 7200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Subaru Outback has
|
Volvo V70 has
| |