Subaru Outback 2017 vs Toyota RAV4 2019
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 175 HP | 199 HP | |
| Torque: | 235 NM | 243 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
|
Toyota RAV4 is a more dynamic driving. Subaru Outback engine produces 24 HP less power than Toyota RAV4, whereas torque is 8 NM less than Toyota RAV4. Due to the lower power, Subaru Outback reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 7.2 | |
|
The Toyota RAV4 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Subaru Outback consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Subaru Outback could require 75 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| 950 km on highway | 910 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
| Ground clearance: | 200 mm (7.9 inches) | 200 mm (7.9 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Toyota RAV4 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 16 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Subaru Forester, Subaru Legacy | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Subaru Outback might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Toyota RAV4 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.82 m | 4.60 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.69 m | |
| Subaru Outback is 22 cm longer than the Toyota RAV4, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Subaru Outback is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 512 litres | 580 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1848 litres | no data | |
|
Toyota RAV4 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Subaru Outback uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 2`100 kg | 2`125 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`592 kg | 1`680 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 508 kg | 445 kg | |
| Subaru Outback load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 12 procentiem more than Toyota RAV4. Therefore, Subaru Outback is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| The Subaru Outback scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 15 200 | 23 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Subaru Outback has
|
Toyota RAV4 has
| |