Subaru Outback 2017 vs Skoda Superb 2019
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 175 HP | 272 HP | |
| Torque: | 235 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 seconds | 5.7 seconds | |
|
Skoda Superb is a more dynamic driving. Subaru Outback engine produces 97 HP less power than Skoda Superb, whereas torque is 115 NM less than Skoda Superb. Due to the lower power, Subaru Outback reaches 100 km/h speed 4.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 7.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.6 l/100km | 9.6 l/100km | |
|
The Subaru Outback is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Subaru Outback consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Superb, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Subaru Outback could require 90 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Subaru Outback consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Superb. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 66 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 920 km in combined cycle | |
| 950 km on highway | 1100 km on highway | ||
| 690 km with real consumption | 680 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 200 mm (7.9 inches) | 136 mm (5.4 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Subaru Outback can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.82 m | 4.86 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Subaru Outback is smaller, but higher. Subaru Outback is 4 cm shorter than the Skoda Superb, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Subaru Outback is 20 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 512 litres | 660 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1848 litres | 1950 litres | |
|
Skoda Superb has more luggage space. Subaru Outback has 148 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Superb. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Superb (by 102 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Subaru Outback is 0.7 metres less than that of the Skoda Superb, which means Subaru Outback can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`100 kg | 2`307 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`592 kg | 1`592 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 508 kg | 715 kg | |
| Subaru Outback load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 41 procentiem less than Skoda Superb. Therefore, Skoda Superb is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 15 200 | 21 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Subaru Outback has
|
Skoda Superb has
| |