Subaru Outback 1998 vs Subaru Forester 1997

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Subaru Outback
1998 - 2003
Subaru Forester
1997 - 2000
Body: Estate car / wagonCrossover / SUV
Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs.
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 2.5 - 3.02.0

Performance

Power: 156 - 209 HP125 - 170 HP
Torque: 223 - 282 NM184 - 240 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.9 - 9.5 seconds8.4 - 12.4 seconds
In general, Subaru Outback are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Subaru Forester. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.0 - 10.59.0 - 10.5
Subaru Outback petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Subaru Forester.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.72 m4.45 m
Width: 1.74 m1.74 m
Height: 1.58 m1.59 m
Subaru Outback is 27 cm longer than the Subaru Forester, width is practically the same , while the height of Subaru Outback is 1 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 527 litres406 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
1649 litres1525 litres
Subaru Outback has more luggage capacity.
Subaru Outback has 121 litres more trunk space than the Subaru Forester. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Subaru Outback (by 124 litres).
Turning diameter: no data10.8 meters
Gross weight: ~ 2`038 kg~ 1`905 kg
Net weight:~ 1`523 kg~ 1`443 kg
Load capacity:~ 515 kg~ 462 kg
Subaru Outback load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 10 procentiem more than Subaru Forester. Therefore, Subaru Outback is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads.
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
high
Average price (€): 16001800
Pros and Cons: Subaru Outback has
  • more powerful and dynamic engines
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
  • higher carrying (cargo) capacity
  • lower price
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv