Subaru Outback 1998 vs Hyundai Lantra 1999
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Subaru Outback is available with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Hyundai Lantra can be equipped with front wheel drive. | |||
Engines: | 2.5 - 3.0 (petrol) | 1.5 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
Both cars are available with petrol engines. Hyundai Lantra is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 156 - 209 HP | 68 - 139 HP | |
Torque: | 223 - 282 NM | 120 - 182 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.9 - 9.5 seconds | 8.8 - 16.5 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.0 - 10.5 | 6.4 - 9.7 | |
Subaru Outback petrol engines consumes on average 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than Hyundai Lantra. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.72 m | 4.45 m | |
Width: | 1.74 m | 1.70 m | |
Height: | 1.58 m | 1.40 m | |
Subaru Outback is larger. Subaru Outback is 27 cm longer than the Hyundai Lantra, 4 cm wider, while the height of Subaru Outback is 18 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 527 litres | no data | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1649 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | no data | 10.5 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`038 | ~ 1`200 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | below average | |
Average price (€): | 1200 | no data | |
Pros and Cons: |
Subaru Outback has
|
Hyundai Lantra has
| |