Subaru Outback 1998 vs Honda CR-V 1997

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Subaru Outback
1998 - 2003
Honda CR-V
1997 - 2002
Body: Estate car / wagonCrossover / SUV
Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs.
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 2.5 - 3.02.0

Performance

Power: 156 - 209 HP128 - 147 HP
Torque: 223 - 282 NM182 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.9 - 9.5 seconds10.5 - 12.5 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.0 - 10.59.7 - 10.2
Subaru Outback petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Honda CR-V.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.72 m4.53 m
Width: 1.74 m1.75 m
Height: 1.58 m1.68 m
Subaru Outback is 19 cm longer than the Honda CR-V, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Subaru Outback is 10 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 527 litres375 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1649 litres670 litres
Subaru Outback has more luggage capacity.
Subaru Outback has 152 litres more trunk space than the Honda CR-V. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Subaru Outback (by 979 litres).
Turning diameter: no data10.6 meters
Gross weight (kg): ~ 2`038~ 1`900
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
high
Average price (€): 12001400
Pros and Cons: Subaru Outback has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv