Subaru Outback 2002 vs Volvo XC70 2000
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.5 - 3.0 (petrol) | 2.4 - 2.5 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 156 - 209 HP | 163 - 210 HP | |
| Torque: | 223 - 282 NM | 285 - 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.9 - 9.5 seconds | 8 - 11.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.5 - 10.5 | 7.6 - 11.3 | |
|
Subaru Outback petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo XC70. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.72 m | 4.73 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.58 m | 1.56 m | |
|
Subaru Outback is smaller, but slightly higher. Subaru Outback is 1 cm shorter than the Volvo XC70, 12 cm narrower, while the height of Subaru Outback is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 464 litres | 485 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1641 litres | |
|
Volvo XC70 has more luggage space. Subaru Outback has 21 litres less trunk space than the Volvo XC70. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`995 | ~ 2`220 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Subaru Outback has
|
Volvo XC70 has
| |