Subaru Outback 2002 vs Volvo V70 2000
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Subaru Outback is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Volvo V70 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Volvo V70 also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.5 - 3.0 (petrol) | 2.3 - 2.5 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 156 - 209 HP | 140 - 300 HP | |
| Torque: | 223 - 282 NM | 192 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.9 - 9.5 seconds | 5.9 - 11.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.5 - 10.5 | 6.5 - 13.6 | |
|
Subaru Outback petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo V70. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.72 m | 4.71 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.58 m | 1.49 m | |
| Subaru Outback and Volvo V70 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 464 litres | 485 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1641 litres | |
|
Volvo V70 has more luggage space. Subaru Outback has 21 litres less trunk space than the Volvo V70. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 13.2 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`995 | ~ 2`123 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Subaru Outback has
|
Volvo V70 has
| |