Subaru Outback 2002 vs Subaru Outback 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.5 - 3.0 | 2.5 - 3.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 156 - 209 HP | 165 - 250 HP | |
| Torque: | 223 - 282 NM | 226 - 339 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.9 - 9.5 seconds | 8.5 - 10.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.5 - 10.5 | 8.5 - 10.5 | |
|
Subaru Outback 2002 petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than Subaru Outback 2003. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.72 m | 4.75 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.58 m | 1.56 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Subaru Outback 2002 is 3 cm shorter than the Subaru Outback 2003, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Subaru Outback 2002 is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 464 litres | 459 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1649 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.8 meters | |
| Gross weight: | ~ 1`995 kg | ~ 1`944 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Subaru Outback has
|
Subaru Outback has
| |