Subaru Outback 2002 vs Nissan X-Trail 2001
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Body: | Estate car / wagon | Crossover / SUV | |
---|---|---|---|
Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
Engines: | 2.5 - 3.0 (petrol) | 2.0 - 2.5 (petrol, diesel) | |
Both cars are available with petrol engines. Nissan X-Trail is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 156 - 209 HP | 114 - 165 HP | |
Torque: | 223 - 282 NM | 192 - 270 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.9 - 9.5 seconds | 9.9 - 13.7 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.5 - 10.5 | 7.2 - 10.0 | |
Subaru Outback petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Nissan X-Trail. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.72 m | 4.51 m | |
Width: | 1.74 m | 1.76 m | |
Height: | 1.58 m | 1.68 m | |
Subaru Outback is 21 cm longer than the Nissan X-Trail, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Subaru Outback is 10 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 464 litres | 410 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1841 litres | |
Subaru Outback has more luggage capacity. Subaru Outback has 54 litres more trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
Turning diameter: | no data | 11 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`995 | ~ 2`010 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | above average | |
Average price (€): | 1800 | 2200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Subaru Outback has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |