Subaru Outback 2003 vs Volvo XC70 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.5 - 3.0 (petrol) | 2.4 - 2.5 (petrol, diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. Volvo XC70 is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 165 - 250 HP | 163 - 210 HP | |
| Torque: | 226 - 339 NM | 320 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 - 10.9 seconds | 8.1 - 11.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 - 10.5 | 7.6 - 11.1 | |
|
Subaru Outback petrol engines consumes on average 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo XC70. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.75 m | 4.73 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.56 m | 1.56 m | |
| Subaru Outback is 2 cm longer than the Volvo XC70, 9 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 459 litres | 485 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1649 litres | 1641 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Subaru Outback uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Subaru Outback (by 8 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Subaru Outback is 0.8 metres less than that of the Volvo XC70, which means Subaru Outback can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 1`944 kg | ~ 2`220 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`495 kg | ~ 1`695 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 449 kg | ~ 525 kg | |
| Subaru Outback load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 17 procentiem less than Volvo XC70. Therefore, Volvo XC70 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 3600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 9.0/10 | 8.0/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Subaru Outback has
|
Volvo XC70 has
| |