Subaru Outback 2003 vs Volvo XC70 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.5 - 3.0 (petrol) | 2.4 - 2.5 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 165 - 245 HP | 163 - 210 HP | |
| Torque: | 226 - 297 NM | 320 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 - 10.9 seconds | 8.1 - 11.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 - 9.8 | 7.6 - 11.1 | |
|
Subaru Outback petrol engines consumes on average 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo XC70. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.73 m | 4.73 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.54 m | 1.56 m | |
| Subaru Outback and Volvo XC70 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 485 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1641 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Subaru Outback is 0.8 metres less than that of the Volvo XC70, which means Subaru Outback can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`840 | ~ 2`220 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 3800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 9.0/10 | 8.0/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Subaru Outback has
|
Volvo XC70 has
| |