Subaru Outback 2003 vs Honda CR-V 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Body: | Estate car / wagon | Crossover / SUV | |
---|---|---|---|
Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
Engines: | 2.5 - 3.0 (petrol) | 2.0 - 2.4 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 165 - 245 HP | 140 - 162 HP | |
Torque: | 226 - 297 NM | 190 - 340 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 - 10.9 seconds | 10.6 - 12 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 - 9.8 | 6.7 - 10.1 | |
Subaru Outback petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than Honda CR-V. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.73 m | 4.61 m | |
Width: | 1.77 m | 1.78 m | |
Height: | 1.54 m | 1.71 m | |
Subaru Outback is 12 cm longer than the Honda CR-V, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Subaru Outback is 17 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 527 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 952 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Subaru Outback is 0.2 metres more than that of the Honda CR-V. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`840 | ~ 1`910 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | above average | |
Average price (€): | 2400 | 2600 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 9.0/10 | 8.4/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Subaru Outback has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |