Subaru Outback 2009 vs Nissan X-Trail 2007
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Subaru Outback is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Nissan X-Trail can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Nissan X-Trail also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.5 - 3.6 (petrol) | 2.0 - 2.5 (petrol, diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. Nissan X-Trail is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 167 - 249 HP | 141 - 173 HP | |
| Torque: | 229 - 350 NM | 196 - 360 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.5 - 10.4 seconds | 9.8 - 12.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.4 - 8.6 | 7.1 - 9.6 | |
|
Subaru Outback petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than Nissan X-Trail. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.78 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Subaru Outback is larger, but lower. Subaru Outback is 15 cm longer than the Nissan X-Trail, 4 cm wider, while the height of Subaru Outback is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1726 litres | 479 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1742 litres | |
|
Subaru Outback has more luggage capacity. Subaru Outback has 1247 litres more trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Subaru Outback is 0.4 metres more than that of the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 2`079 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 4800 | 4600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.6/10 | 8.0/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Subaru Outback has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |