Subaru Outback 2013 vs Subaru Outback 2009
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 3.6 (petrol, diesel) | 2.5 - 3.6 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 - 260 HP | 167 - 249 HP | |
| Torque: | 235 - 350 NM | 229 - 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.6 - 9.9 seconds | 7.5 - 10.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 - 9.9 | 8.4 - 8.6 | |
|
Subaru Outback 2013 petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Subaru Outback 2009. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.78 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.57 m | |
|
Subaru Outback 2013 is larger. Subaru Outback 2013 is 2 cm longer than the Subaru Outback 2009, width is practically the same , while the height of Subaru Outback 2013 is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 526 litres | 1726 litres | |
|
Subaru Outback 2009 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Subaru Outback 2013 has 1200 litres less trunk space than the Subaru Outback 2009. This could mean that the Subaru Outback 2013 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Subaru Outback 2013 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Subaru Outback 2009. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`979 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 17 800 | 5800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Subaru Outback has
|
Subaru Outback has
| |