Subaru Outback 2013 vs Subaru Legacy 2009
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 3.6 | 2.0 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 - 260 HP | 150 - 265 HP | |
| Torque: | 235 - 350 NM | 196 - 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.6 - 9.9 seconds | 6.3 - 11.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 - 9.9 | 6.1 - 10.6 | |
|
Subaru Outback petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Subaru Legacy. On average, a Subaru Outback with diesel engines consumes about the same amount of fuel per 100 km as a Subaru Legacy. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.78 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.54 m | |
|
Subaru Outback is larger. Subaru Outback is 2 cm longer than the Subaru Legacy, 5 cm wider, while the height of Subaru Outback is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 526 litres | 526 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1660 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Subaru Outback is 0.4 metres less than that of the Subaru Legacy, which means Subaru Outback can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`979 | ~ 2`036 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Subaru Outback scores higher in safety tests, but Subaru Legacy is better rated in child safety tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 17 400 | 4000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Subaru Outback has
|
Subaru Legacy has
| |