Subaru Outback 2013 vs Subaru Forester 2013

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Subaru Outback
2013 - 2017
Subaru Forester
2013 - 2016
Body: Estate car / wagonCrossover / SUV
Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs.
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 2.0 - 3.62.0 - 2.5

Performance

Power: 150 - 260 HP147 - 240 HP
Torque: 235 - 350 NM198 - 350 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7.6 - 9.9 seconds7.5 - 11.8 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.9 - 9.95.7 - 8.5
Subaru Outback petrol engines consumes on average 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Subaru Forester. On average, Subaru Outback equipped with diesel engines consume 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Forester.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.80 m4.60 m
Width: 1.83 m1.80 m
Height: 1.62 m1.74 m
Subaru Outback is larger, but lower.
Subaru Outback is 20 cm longer than the Subaru Forester, 3 cm wider, while the height of Subaru Outback is 11 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 526 litres505 litres
Subaru Outback has more luggage capacity.
Subaru Outback has 21 litres more trunk space than the Subaru Forester.
Turning diameter: 11 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Subaru Outback is 0.4 metres more than that of the Subaru Forester, which means Subaru Outback can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`979~ 2`055
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
average
Average price (€): 17 80017 800
Pros and Cons:
    Subaru Forester has
    • lower fuel consumption
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv