Subaru Outback 2013 vs Volkswagen Passat 2014

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Subaru Outback
2013 - 2017
Volkswagen Passat
2014 - 2019
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Subaru Outback is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Volkswagen Passat can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Volkswagen Passat also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs.
Engines: 2.0 - 3.61.4 - 2.0

Performance

Power: 150 - 260 HP120 - 240 HP
Torque: 235 - 350 NM200 - 500 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7.6 - 9.9 seconds6.3 - 11 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.9 - 9.94.0 - 6.3
Subaru Outback petrol engines consumes on average 3.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen Passat. On average, Subaru Outback equipped with diesel engines consume 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Passat.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.80 m4.77 m
Width: 1.83 m1.83 m
Height: 1.62 m1.49 m
Subaru Outback is 3 cm longer than the Volkswagen Passat, width is practically the same , while the height of Subaru Outback is 13 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 526 litres651 litres
Volkswagen Passat has more luggage space.
Despite its longer length, Subaru Outback has 125 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Passat. This could mean that the Subaru Outback uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable.
Turning diameter: 11 metersno data
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`979~ 2`094
Safety:
Quality: no data
below average
Average price (€): 17 40014 000
Pros and Cons:
    Volkswagen Passat has
    • also available in 2WD
    • lower fuel consumption
    • roomier boot
    • lower price
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv